While montage is generally considered to pertain first and foremost to rhetorical strategies of production and persuasion, in her research Roben Curtis seeks to investigate the degree to which montage, understood here as the aspects of combination and association called up by the viewer’s processes of imagination, may be understood as a significant part of the process of aesthetic reception.
Current notions of what immersion entails suggest that both illusory spatial effects and oftentimes a particularly “interactive” apparatus-based experience are necessary for the creation of such a state of deep involvement with an aesthetic object. She argues instead that immersion is a product of the effort to combine and synthesize (oftentimes even) contradictory aspects of that experience and moreover that such synthetic participation is dependant on the particular aesthetic characteristics provided by the “text” or object of aesthetic attention in question, rather than a product of the medium per se. The spatial cues are offered by a given work function in conjunction with the particular manner in which such cues are integrated by the reader, user or viewer, into his or her own imaginary conceptualization of that “possible world.”
Within her present research Robin Curtis seeks to examine the extent to which, instead of being understood as an a priori of the apparatus, immersion might be better conceptualized as the result of a complex set of ramifications of the process of reception, as set out by a given aesthetic object. Thus immersion – and this is her working hypothesis – is understood to be the result the processes of combination and synthesis which are part and parcel of the confrontation between inter- and multimodal perception and an aesthetic object.
The Bauhaus artist and pedagogue, László Moholy-Nagy, began experimenting with film in the early 1920s and sporadically to make short films sporadically until his premature death in 1946. By considering the relationship between his Light Space Modulator (1930) and the (often neglected) big city films that he made between 1930 and 1932 (Marseille Vieux Port 1929, Berliner Stilleben 1931, and Großstadtzigeuner 1932), it will be argued that Moholy-Nagy’s filmic practice adumbrates an immersive experience based on a perceptual montage, one that contributes substantially to his programme of “Sinneserweiterung.”
The event was part of the closed workshop “Body Montage. Cultures of Corporeal Dis/Assembling, 1900-1933” of the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science which took place from May 27-29 at the Boltzmannstraße 22, Berlin.
The event, like all events at the ICI Berlin, is open to the public, free of charge. The audience is presumed to consent to a possible recording on the part of the ICI Berlin. If you would like to attend the event yet might require assistance, please contact Event Management.