De/Constituting WholesTowards Partiality Without PartsVienna: Turia + Kant, 2017
Copy to Clipboard
Add italics as necessary
Cite as: Robert Meunier and Valentine Reynaud, ‘The Innate Plasticity of Bodies and Minds: Integrating Models of Genetic Determination and Environmental Formation’, in De/Constituting Wholes: Towards Partiality Without Parts, ed. by Christoph F. E. Holzhey and Manuele Gragnolati, Cultural Inquiry, 11 (Vienna: Turia + Kant, 2017), pp. 151–76 <https://doi.org/10.37050/ci-11_08>

The Innate Plasticity of Bodies and MindsIntegrating Models of Genetic Determination and Environmental FormationRobert Meunier and Valentine Reynaud

Keywords: Organisms; Environmental influence; Developmental biology; Phenotypic plasticity; Wholeness; Epigenetics; Evolutionary biology; Innateness (Philosophy)

In recent years, concepts of plasticity and epigenetics have gained currency in different areas of the life sciences. In this article, we wish to ask primarily how plasticity and epigenetics relate to some notions in biology that they are often taken to oppose, such as genetic determination, genetic programme, and innateness.

[…]

Click here to open the pdf in a new window or download.

Bibliography

  1. Block, Ned, ‘Introduction: What Is Philosophy of Psychology?’, in Readings in Philosophy of Psychology, ed. by Ned Block (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981), ii, pp. 1–8
  2. Buller, David J., Adapting Minds (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005)
  3. Carruthers, Peter, Stephen Laurence, and Stephen Stich, The Innate Mind: Structure and Contents (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005)
  4. Chomsky, Noam, Rules and Representations (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1980)
  5. Darden, Lindley and Joseph A. Cain, ‘Selection Type Theories’, Philosophy of Science, 56.1 (1989), pp. 106–29 <https://doi.org/10.1086/289475>
  6. Davidson, Eric H., The Regulatory Genome: Gene Regulatory Networks in Development and Evolution (Burlington, MA: Academic Press, 2006) <https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012088563-3.50022-5>
  7. Elman, Jeffrey L., et al., Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996)
  8. Fodor, Jerry, The Modularity of Mind (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1983)
  9. Gopnik, Alison, Andrew N. Meltzoff, and Patricia K. Kuhl, The Scientist in the Crib: Minds, Brains, and How Children Learn (New York: William Morrow, 1999)
  10. Gould, James L. and Peter Marler, ‘Learning by Instinct’, Scientific American, 256.1 (1987), pp. 62–73
  11. Gray, Russel, ‘Death of the Gene: Developmental Systems Strike Back’, in Trees of Life: Essays in the Philosophy of Biology, ed. by Paul E. Griffiths (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1992), pp. 165–209
  12. Griffiths, Paul, ‘What Is Innateness?’, The Monist, 85.1 (2002), pp. 70–85
  13. Griffiths, Paul and Karola Stotz, Genetics and Philosophy: An Introduction (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013)
  14. Griffiths, Paul and Russel Gray, ‘Developmental Systems and Evolutionary Explanation’, The Journal of Philosophy, 91.6 (1994), pp. 277–304
  15. Hull, David L., Rodney E. Langman, and Sigrid S. Glenn, ‘A General Account of Selection: Biology, Immunology, and Behavior’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24.3 (2001), pp. 511–28 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X01004162>
  16. Jablonka, Eva and Gal Raz, ‘Transgenerational Epigenetic Inheritance: Prevalence, Mechanisms, and Implications for the Study of Heredity and Evolution’, The Quarterly Review of Biology, 84.2 (2009), pp. 131–76
  17. Jablonka, Eva and Marion J. Lamb, Evolution in Four Dimensions: Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral, and Symbolic Variation in the History of Life (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005)
  18. James, William, The Principles of Psychology (New York: H. Holt, 1890)
  19. Jasanoff, Sheila, ‘The Idiom of Co-Production’, in States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and the Social Order, ed. by Sheila Jasanoff (London: Routledge, 2004), pp. 1–12 <https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203413845>
  20. Karmiloff-Smith, Annette, ‘Bates’s Emergentist Theory and Its Relevance to Understanding Genotype/Phenotype Relations’, in Beyond Nature-Nurture: Essays in Honor of Elizabeth Bates, ed. by M. Tomasello and D. Slibin (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2005), pp. 219–36
  21. Beyond Modularity: A Developmental Perspective on Cognitive Science (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992)
  22. Kay, Lily E., Who Wrote the Book of Life? A History of the Genetic Code (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2000)
  23. Keller, Evelyn Fox, The Century of the Gene (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000)
  24. Kirschner, Marc and John Gerhart, ‘Evolvability’, PNAS, 95 (1998), pp. 8420–27
  25. Lamm, Ehud, ‘Inheritance Systems’, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2014 edition), ed. by E.N. Zalta, <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/inheritance-systems> [accessed 5 Febuary 2016]
  26. Malabou, Catherine, What Should We Do with Our Brain?, trans. by S. Rand (New York: Fordham University Press, 2008)
  27. Meloni, Maurizio and Giuseppe Testa, ‘Scrutinizing the Epigenetics Revolution’, BioSocieties, 9 (2014), pp. 431–56 <https://doi.org/10.1057/biosoc.2014.22>
  28. Morange, Michel, La part des genes (Paris: Editions Odile Jacob, 1998)
  29. ‘Quelle place pour l’épigénétique?’, Médecine/science, 21 (2005), pp. 367–69
  30. Müller, Gerd B., ‘Novelty and Key Innovation’, in Encyclopedia of Evolution, ed. by M. Pagel (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), pp. 827–30
  31. Nijhout, H. Frederik, ‘Metaphors and the Role of Genes in Development’, BioEssays, 12.9 (1990), pp. 441–46 <https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.950120908>
  32. Novas, Carlos and Nikolas Rose, ‘Genetic Risk and the Birth of the Somatic Individual’, Economy and Society, 29.4 (2000), pp. 485–513 <https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140050174750>
  33. Oyama, Susan, The Ontogeny of Information: Developmental Systems and Evolution (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2000)
  34. Pickersgill, Martyn, Jörg Niewöhner, Ruth Müller, Paul Martin, and Sarah Cunningham-Burley, ‘Mapping the New Molecular Landscape: Social Dimensions of Epigenetics’, New Genetics and Society, 32.4 (2013), pp. 429–47 <https://doi.org/10.1080/14636778.2013.861739>
  35. Pigliucci, Massimo, ‘Genotype–Phenotype Mapping and the End of the “Genes as Blueprint” Metaphor’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 365 (2010), pp. 557–66 <https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0241>
  36. ‘What, If Anything, Is an Evolutionary Novelty?’, Philosophy of Science, 75.5 (2008), pp. 887–98 <https://doi.org/10.1086/594532>
  37. Pigliucci, Massimo and Gerd B. Müller, Evolution: The Extended Synthesis (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2010) <https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262513678.001.0001>
  38. Pinker, Steven, The Language Instinct (New York: William Morrow, 1994)
  39. Quartz, Steven and Terrence J. Sejnowski, ‘The Neural Basis of Cognitive Development: A Constructivist Manifesto’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20 (1997), pp. 537–96
  40. Ramus, Franck, ‘Genes, Brain, and Cognition: A Roadmap for the Cognitive Scientist’, Cognition, 101 (2006), pp. 247–69
  41. Reynaud, Valentine, ‘Can Innateness Ascriptions Avoid Tautology?’, Philosophia Scientiae, 18.3 (2014), pp. 177–90
  42. Samuels, Richard, ‘What Brains Won’t Tell Us about the Mind: A Critique of the Neurobiological Argument against Representational Nativism’, Mind & Language, 13.4 (1998), pp. 548–70
  43. Sterelny, Kim and Paul E. Griffiths, Sex and Death: An Introduction to Philosophy of Biology (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999) <https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226178653.001.0001>
  44. Waddington, Conrad H., ‘Canalization of Development and the Inheritance of Acquired Characters’, Nature, 150.3811 (1942), pp. 563–65
  45. The Epigenotype’, Endeavour, 1 (1942), pp. 18–20
  46. Weigel, Sigrid, ‘An der Schwelle von Kultur und Natur. Epigenetik und Evolutionstheorie’, in Evolution in Natur und Kultur, ed. by Volker Gerhardt and Julian Nida-Rümelin (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2010), pp. 103–23
  47. West-Eberhard, Mary Jane, ‘Phenotypic Accommodation: Adaptive Innovation Due to Developmental Plasticity’, Journal of Experimental Zoology, 304b (2005), pp. 610–18
  48. ‘Toward a Modern Revival of Darwin’s Theory of Evolutionary Novelty’, Philosophy of Science, 75.5 (2008), pp. 899–908 <https://doi.org/10.1086/594533>