Tension/​SpannungVienna: Turia + Kant, 2010
Cite as: Jean Terrier, ‘On Social Forces: Tension as a Metaphor and the Image of Society’, in Tension/​Spannung, ed. by Christoph F. E. Holzhey, Cultural Inquiry, 1 (Vienna: Turia + Kant, 2010), pp. 185–205 <https://doi.org/10.25620/ci-01_10>

On Social ForcesTension as a Metaphor and the Image of SocietyJean Terrier

Abstract

This article conceptualizes tension as a relation between elements in which at least two forces with different directions are involved. How can this concept of tension be applied to the analysis of the peculiar logic of life in common? The article offers a reading, inspired by the method of conceptual history, of the use of the concept of ‘force’ in three models of society: Hobbes’s political model, the economic model proposed by the thinkers of commercial society, and Durkheim’s social theory. The analysis sheds some light on the ways in which the presence of contradictory forces can be taken to be constitutive of the social itself. This observation is then used to suggest that the puzzling fascination exerted by the notion of tension can be better understood if we see it pointing to some fundamental features of our way of collectively inhabiting the world.

Durkheim, Hobbes, social theory, tension

References

  1. Austin, John L., How to Do Things with Words (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1975)
  2. Benhabib, Seyla, ed., Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996)
  3. Dryzek, John, and Simon Niemeyer, ‘Reconciling Pluralism and Consensus as Political Ideals’, American Journal of Political Science, 50.3 (2006), pp. 634–49
  4. Durkheim, Emile, De la division du travail social (Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1991)
  5. Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse (Paris: Alcan, 1912)
  6. Les règles de la méthode sociologique (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2007)
  7. Geertz, Clifford, The Interpretation of Cultures (New York: Basic Books, 1973)
  8. Gellner, Ernest, Nations and Nationalism: New Perspectives on the Past (London: Blackwell, 1983)
  9. Gillespie, Michael A., ‘The theological origins of modernity’, Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society, 13.1 (1999), pp. 1–30
  10. Hayek, Friedrich von, The Constitution of Liberty (London: Routledge, 2006)
  11. Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan, ed. by Richard Tuck (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008)
  12. On the Citizen, ed. by Richard Tuck and Michael Silverthorne (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005)
  13. Hume, David, An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals, ed. by Jerome B. Schneewind (Indianapolis; Cambridge, MA: Hackett, 1983)
  14. ‘Of commerce’, in Political Writings, ed. by Knud Haakonssen (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006)
  15. Joas, Hans, Die Entstehung der Werte (Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, 1997)
  16. Johnston, David, The Rhetoric of Leviathan: Thomas Hobbes and the Politics of Cultural Transformation (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989)
  17. Kohn, Hans, Nationalism: Its Meaning and History (Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand, 1955)
  18. Lefort, Claude, L’invention démocratique: Les limites de la domination totalitaire (Paris: Fayard, 1981)
  19. Lukes, Steven, Power: A Radical View. The Original Text with Two Major New Chapters (Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005)
  20. Rawls, Anne W., ‘Durkheim’s Epistemology: The Neglected Argument’, American Journal of Sociology, 102.2 (September 1996), pp. 430–82
  21. Rawls, John, ‘The Idea of an Overlapping Consensus’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 7.1 (Spring 1987), pp. 1–25
  22. Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, Ecrits politiques (Paris: Gallimard / Pléiade, 1964)
  23. Schmitt, Carl, Der Leviathan in der Staatslehre des Thomas Hobbes: Sinn und Fehlschlag eines politischen Symbols (Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 2003)
  24. Schneewind, Jerome B., The Invention of Autonomy: A History of Modern Moral Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997)
  25. Sewell, William H. Jr., ‘Geertz, Cultural Systems, and History: From Synchrony to Transformation’, Representations, 59 (Summer 1997), pp. 35–55
  26. Skinner, Quentin, Visions of Politics, 3 vols (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002)
  27. Swidler, Anne, ‘Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies’, American Sociological Review, 51.2 (April 1986), pp. 273–86
  28. Terrier, Jean, ‘Die Verortung der Gesellschaft: Durkheims Verwendung des Begriffs “Substrat” ’, Berliner Journal für Soziologie, 19.2 (June 2009), pp. 181–204
  29. Weber, Max, ‘Die drei reinen Typen der legitimen Herrschaft’, in Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre (Tübingen: Mohr / Siebeck, 1985), pp. 481–88
  30. Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Philosophical Investigations (Oxford: Blackwell, 1976)